About
About this site
Every page here is written out of one document: the Supplement Facts panel on the Lungora label. This page sets out what that rule means in practice, what arrived with the product and was deliberately not published, and how this desk is paid.
This is an independent retail desk publishing product information for Lungora. The Supplement Facts panel is the source; marketing artwork is not. Quantities the label does not print are derived from the figures it does print and stated as ceilings, never invented. Missing facts stay “not published”. No rating, no testimonials and no before-and-after photographs appear anywhere on this site.
What this desk is, and is not
This is a retail desk. It sells nothing itself, holds no stock, fills no orders and cannot see one. Lungoraformula is not the manufacturer of Lungora and has no part in making, filling, testing or shipping it.
| Detail | What we were actually given |
|---|---|
| What this site is | An independent product-information desk. Licensed U.S. retail desk for Lungora. |
| What it is not | The manufacturer, the distributor, a laboratory or a clinic. |
| Who writes it | The Lungora Editorial Desk. No byline, no author portrait, no invented practitioner. |
| Product facts come from | The flat label artwork supplied with the product, transcribed row by row. |
| Research facts come from | Eleven named public documents, all opened and read, all linked. |
| Office | 1166 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 7, New York, NY 10036, USA |
| Returns, handled by the seller | 245 Park Avenue, Floor 24, New York, NY 10167, USA |
| Website email | Listed in the site footer — pages, typos, privacy, press. Mon–Fri 9–5 ET. It cannot see orders. |
| Order desk | Phone and email in the site footer — orders, tracking, changes, refunds. |
| Distributor on the bottle | lungora, Aurora, CO 80011 |
| Last updated | October 29, 2026 |
Those last three rows are three different organisations. This desk can correct a page and nothing else. The contact page sets out what each route can do.
Which documents count as evidence
A pack of material arrived with this product, and not all of it is the same kind of thing. A label is a regulated document; a lifestyle graphic is an advertisement. This site treats them differently.
| Document | Used as a source? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| The flat label artwork | Yes — the primary source | Legible, complete, and the only thing in the pack carrying regulatory weight. |
| The Supplement Facts panel | Yes — the spine of the site | Two rows, one printed amount. Every calculation here starts there. |
| The marketing graphics | Quoted as claims only | Transcribed on the mechanism page with the origin named. One shows a bottle carrying a third bulleted claim the label does not. |
| The bottle photographs | No, and none is published | Enlarged, the base reads “GAPEULES” and “BIETART SUPMLENDIT”. The product image here comes from the label artwork. |
| The eleven marks | Eight shown, three withheld | Not one is printed on the label. One is misprinted twice over; one names a doctor it does not identify. |
| The seller pack’s review block | No | The pack states in its own closing block that its reviews, star scores and order counts are layout copy. |
| Lot LUN-26/LU-8072, certificate LUN-8072-26-LU | Draft references only | No certificate and no laboratory letter reached this desk, so neither proves anything. |
The nine rules these pages follow
Not aspirations — rules a reader can hold this site to. Every one of them cost something on this product.
The panel is the source
Where panel and marketing disagree, the panel wins. The label front carries two bulleted claims; a marketing graphic shows three. This site reports two.
Marketing artwork is not a source of fact
A graphic can be quoted as a claim. It cannot supply an amount, a certification, a country of manufacture or a review.
Unprinted quantities are derived, and stated as ceilings
This site prints “at most 7.5 mg”, never “7.5 mg”. The second would be an invention, and that difference is the method.
The working is always shown
Every derived figure can be recomputed from two numbers on the bottle and one molecular weight. The sum runs in six steps on the label page.
Every quotation comes from the document it is attributed to
Eleven sources, all opened, all linked. There is no “studies show” anywhere here.
Missing facts stay missing
Where the label prints nothing, the page reads not published. No country of manufacture, no allergen statement, no legible expiry and no price at all — each an absence, never filled in.
No rating, no testimonial, no portrait, no before-and-after
A permanent rule on this site, not a comment on this product.
No invented people, addresses or documents
No doctor, reviewer, laboratory letter, licence or street address is invented to fill a gap. The Doctor Formulated emblem supplied names no doctor, so it is not published here.
Draft references are labelled as drafts
Lot LUN-26/LU-8072 and certificate reference LUN-8072-26-LU arrived as references. Neither is laboratory proof, and both say so wherever they appear.
Why every blend figure here is a ceiling
- The panel declares Magnesium (as Magnesium Glycinate from proprietary blend) — 80 mg. The declaration is required; the words “from proprietary blend” are not, and they are what make everything below possible.
- Magnesium glycinate is C₄H₈MgN₂O₄, molecular weight about 172.4, of which the magnesium atom is 24.3 — about 14.1% by weight.
- Delivering 80 mg of elemental magnesium therefore needs about 567 mg of the compound.
- The blend’s printed total is 575 mg, leaving roughly 8 mg for alpha lipoic acid, butcher’s broom, L-carnitine, turmeric and coenzyme Q10 combined.
- The descending-order rule divides that remainder: at most 7.5, 3.7, 2.5, 1.9 and 1.5 mg.
A ceiling is not an amount, and this site never prints one as if it were
Each of those five figures is an upper limit; the true amounts are at or below them. Ceilings are worth publishing because they can only be beaten downwards — when one already sits far below any studied dose, the conclusion holds whatever the real figure is. Where it does not, this site says so rather than guessing.
Step two assumes the pure anhydrous chelate; a buffered one raises the elemental percentage, and the label does not say which is used. Run across the plausible range, the magnesium ingredient is between 70% and 99% of the blend at every point. The severity moves; the finding does not.
Supplied, and not published
The most useful list an information desk can publish is what it threw away, because that is the part a reader cannot check.
Published here
- Both panel rows, transcribed exactly as printed.
- Suggested use, caution block, storage and safety lines, in full.
- All twelve claims supplied anywhere, each with the document it came from.
- Eight of the eleven marks, each with what it does and does not evidence.
- The derived ceilings, always labelled as ceilings, always with the working.
- Fifteen things this label does not publish, listed on the ingredients page.
Supplied and refused
- A rating of 4.4 out of 5, 654 written reviews, 9,186 orders, 86% recommending.
- Eight named customers with quotations attached to them.
- A “most wait 4–8 weeks” line: a marketing sentence, not a finding.
- Every bottle photograph, all carrying misprinted label text.
- The “made in USA” roundel, whose ring reads MANUFACTURE IN twice and never finishes.
- The Doctor Formulated emblem, which names no doctor and no credential.
“Reviews, star scores, and order counts in this pack are layout copy only.”
The seller pack supplied with this product, in its own closing block
When the document supplying the reviews states in writing that the reviews are layout, there is nothing left to weigh. That is why the reviews page on this site carries no reviews.
How this site is paid
Lungoraformula earns a commission when a reader buys through the checkout link on this site. The seller pays it out of the sale. It does not change the price you pay, it is not added to it, and it is not avoided by buying elsewhere.
What it does not change is what appears here. This site scores the product it links to at 1.5 out of 5, the lowest figure this desk has published; recommends the smallest quantity pictured rather than the largest; publishes twelve findings, most of which work against the sale; and refuses the rating and testimonials that came with the pack.
No price exists on this site, and none will be invented
None was supplied. The seller pack routes pricing to the checkout screen, so the live figure is shown there and nowhere here. This desk cannot tell you what a bottle costs, compare packs on value or compute a cost per capsule — and will not estimate any of it. The pricing page says so at greater length.
The score in four numbers
Six categories are scored out of five on the verdict page, from the label and the sources rather than from any experience of taking the product. Nobody here has taken it. Two rows deserve a note: label transparency scores two rather than one, because this panel names all six blend ingredients, both Latin binomials and plant parts, and adds the four voluntary words that make the analysis possible; and ingredient evidence scores one not because the ingredients are disreputable but because a product named after an organ has no ingredient with a monograph about that organ.
The eleven sources
Every document quoted anywhere on this site: four from the FDA, three from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, three from NCCIH, one from PubChem. All were opened and read, and every quotation is copied from the page linked here.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Dietary Supplement Labeling Guide: Chapter IV. Nutrition Labeling.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Daily Value on the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Magnesium — Health Professional Fact Sheet.
- PubChem, National Library of Medicine (2026). Magnesium Glycinate, CID 84645.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). Turmeric: Usefulness and Safety.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2019). Coenzyme Q10.
- NIH Office of Dietary Supplements (2026). Carnitine — Health Professional Fact Sheet.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2023). Diabetes and Dietary Supplements: What You Need To Know.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2025). “Detoxes” and “Cleanses”: What You Need To Know.
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (2022). Asthma and Complementary Health Approaches: What You Need To Know.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2026). Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements.
One source is cited for a negative. Searching the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements and NCCIH for butcher’s broom and for Ruscus aculeatus returns no fact sheet at all, so there is nothing to list and the ingredient entry says exactly that and stops.
Corrections
Corrections go to the top of the queue. If a figure here is wrong, a quotation misattributed, or the label you hold differs from the artwork transcribed here, write to the website inbox and name the page and the line.
One correction would change more of this site than any other: which magnesium glycinate is used, and what its elemental magnesium content is. One sentence from the formulator either confirms the arithmetic here or replaces it. The batch page carries the call script, and a better figure would be recomputed in public.
Read this page as commitments rather than description. If a star rating ever appears here, or a transformation photograph, or a blend ingredient quoted as an amount rather than a ceiling, this page is the evidence that something changed.
Read the magnesium row before you decide
Thirty capsules, one a day. One amount is printed on this label — 80 mg of magnesium — and it is the amount that tells you what is left of the 575 mg blend for the other five ingredients. The live price and the 60-day return terms are both on the seller’s checkout screen.
60-day window · Questions first? The FAQ page answers most of them.